English   |    French

  Tuesday PM

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Journalists for Justice / 01 February 2017

 By Elise Keppler,

The African Union made headlines Tuesday for purportedly agreeing to mass withdrawal from the International Criminal Court. The reality is more complex.

The decision by AU member states welcomes the announced withdrawals by South Africa, Burundi, and Gambia, adopts the “ICC withdrawal strategy,” and calls for member states to consider implementing its recommendations. This is based on text we have seen that, while labeled a draft, reflects the final text, sources close to the negotiations said.

But there was vocal opposition by ministers to withdrawal at last week’s AU summit. The Nigerian foreign minister said that the ICC has “an important role to play in holding leaders accountable,” and that “Nigeria is not the only voice agitating against [withdrawal], in fact Senegal is very strongly speaking against it, Cape Verde, and other countries are also against it.”

Nigeria, Senegal, and Cape Verde ultimately entered formal reservations to the decision adopted by heads of state. Liberia entered a reservation to the paragraph that adopts the strategy, and Malawi, Tanzania, Tunisia, and Zambia requested more time to study it.

Meanwhile, the “strategy” does not actually call for mass withdrawal, based on the text that Human Rights Watch reviewed. The document instead states: “Further research on the idea of collective withdrawal, a concept that has not yet been recognized by international law, is required.”

Instead the document revisits AU concerns with the court—including its relationship with the United Nations Security Council and a bid to amend the court’s statute to exempt sitting leaders implicated in widespread atrocities. The document offers information about how states may withdraw from the statute, and notes that lack of adoption of AU proposals to amend the statute could be conditions for withdrawal, but says only that a “timeline for reform should be clearly agreed upon.”

Outside of AU meetings, Nigeria, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Mali, Malawi, Zambia, Tanzania, Ghana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Sierra Leone, and Botswana have clearly spoken out in their capitals, New York, and The Hague to expressly reaffirm their commitment to the ICC. The new Gambian president, Adama Barrow, also expressed his intention for Gambia to retract its withdrawal.

This support—and opposition to withdrawal plans—should be strengthened. The ICC is the only court of last resort to deliver justice for victims of mass atrocities when national courts are unable or unwilling. As advocates for victims have said, its reach should be expanded, not curtailed.

 

Elise Keppler is Associate Director, International Justice Programme, Human Rights Watch

< >

Other Headlines


Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Four crucial points for the future of the ICC

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 23 January 2018

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Kony ordered us to cut off Tabuley’s head and carry it to Sudan within four days, witness tells court

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 22 January 2018

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

ICC state parties meeting adds use of biological weapons, undetectable X-ray fragments and laser weapons to list of War Crimes in Rome Statute

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 15 December 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Book serialisation: Hopes, triumphs and failures at the ICC (Part 2)

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 11 December 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Book serialisation: Hopes, triumphs and failures at the ICC

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 04 December 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Ocampo speaks out on leaked emails

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 04 December 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Journalists speak about challenges of reporting ICC trials

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Mother of All Tribunals gears up for last trial judgment in historic Mladic case

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Ntaganda’s defence witness testifies under court protection

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

ICC judges allow prosecutor to investigate crimes in Burundi

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Clouds of smoke and no fire in AU's ICC withdrawal strategy

Glimmer of hope for Gbagbo as appeal judges order review of his detention

BY Susan Kendi / ON 21 July 2017